Find us On Facebook Twitter
News
news and events Events Energy Lectures Sustainability 2011 Sustainability 2010 Sustainability 2009 White Symposium Whiting Turner Lectures Current News News Archives Search News Press Coverage Press Releases Research Newsroom RSS feed Events Calendar events events

News Story

Current Headlines

UMD Announces Appointment of Schultheis to Lead New Regulatory Science Initiative

UMD Steel Bridge Team Meets Members of Congress at AISI Steel Day in DC

Hubbard Chosen for HistoryMakers Oral History Collection

Delivering Drugs to Inner Ear, Eyes, and Brain Made Easier with "Magnetic Syringe"

Vote to Support Team Mulciber in Wood Stove Design Challenge

BioE and Mtech Partner with Children's National Health System to Form Pediatric Device Consortium

NSF-Backed DC I-Corps Kicks Off First Cohort with 20 Federal Laboratory, University and Regional Inventors, Entrepreneur Teams

UMD Hosts 2nd Cybersecurity and Cybersafety Workshop for Girls

UMD Ranked Top Public School for Tech Entrepreneurship in 2013 StartEngine College Index

ECE Students Take Top Prize at Michigan Hackathon for Intelligent Trashcan

News Resources

Return to Newsroom

Search Clark School News

Research Newsroom

Press Releases

Archived News

Magazines and Publications

Press Coverage

Clark School RSS Feed

Events Resources

Clark School Events

Events Calendar

Bookmark and Share

Cumings Discusses Crane Collapses Online

John Cumings

John Cumings

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Assistant Professor John Cumings was online with Washington Post staff writer David Brown on June 16 to discuss Brown's story about the recent tower crane collapses in New York City and Miami, Fla. The chat session, titled "Physics of a Crane Collapse," was a follow-up to a story published the same day, for which Cumings was also consulted.

Brown's story and discussion focused on whether tower cranes—huge, modular pieces of equipment capable of building high-rise buildings in crowded city spaces—were inherently unsafe or prone to structural failure. Cumings was one of several professors in his story who discussed the physics and materials science behind the design, operation and construction of the cranes.

Tower cranes have good safety records overall. The engineering behind them, such as how they balance, how much they can safely lift, and how they are affected by forces created by wind or swinging loads, is well established. However, they are also subject to environmental stresses leading to metal fatigue and failure, and to human error. Corrosion and repair sites provide opportunities for metal to bend or break, while improperly trained inspectors and operators can miss danger signs or cause accidents. The expense of renting a tower crane and hiring an experienced operator coupled with a recent construction boom may also play a role in whether or not the equipment can be used safely.

"[The] design of cranes relatively straightforward," Cumings wrote in the online chat. "However, I can imagine that on a job site there might be a tendency to[ward] pushing the limit, even a little bit, in order to move a job along faster. No level of mathematics ahead of time can solve this problem down the road."

Read a transcript of the online chat session.

Read Brown's related story: "Tower Cranes: Efficient, Versatile—but How Safe?"

Visit the Washington Post's Science home page

June 16, 2008


Prev   Next